someone gives wrong intel

**AsO|-Special_K_33** · 10-09-06, 02:22 PM

This is always a simple yet costly mistake. One ct says that the whole team is rushing to one bomb site; but in reality, the terrorists are really rushing the other site. This happened last night: a ct at site B says that the t's are rushing site B...too bad we went to B because the t's went long and planted at A. This is an unintentional mistake, so I don't get angry about it. I just feel like venting because I had a long day at class, and I had some road rage while going home.

**Mr.Jello** · 10-09-06, 02:26 PM

Shit happens.

**greymata** · 10-09-06, 03:35 PM

i really hate that shit... and it gets me more than a little mad, especially if that same person does it again and again and again... here's an idea guys... instead of telling us they are "at b" or "long a" just tell us what is happening to you. Ex. "I'm getting flashed at long" or "& terrorists just came into b, and i about to die"

if you dont get the whole sentence out, we know they've killed you. its that easy. especially with the new radar. its like being able to see the other side of the map through the walls. its better than hubhacks.

**AsO|-Special_K_33** · 10-09-06, 07:04 PM

Yeah sometimes the team needs to communicate more efficiently. If you get flashed at b, say something along the lines of, "They're at tunnels throwing fbs. Watch out for mid and short!" Speaking of communications, I should probably start using my mic since it looks bad complaining about team comminication when I don't even contribute much except for radio commands of "sector clear" and "enemy spotted" (and other commands).

**greymata** · 10-09-06, 08:30 PM

radio commands are for idiots without a mic, idiotsthat like to spam radio commands, or idiots that got their chick pregnant over 9 months ago and has to deal with sleeping babies now. i fall under the third idiot category.